At Laptop computer Magazine we love convertible laptop computer, however we’re very specific about which make it to our finest 2-in-1 laptops listing.
All of our prime picks are 4 to 4.5-star convertibles, and even then the competitors is fierce.
Asus‘ current Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) 2-in-1 is the most recent convertible worthy of consideration for our Finest listing, however the place does it stack up towards the competitors?
Whereas the HP Spectre x360 14 (2024) is our greatest 2-in-1 laptop computer total, we have been additionally very keen on the 16-inch mannequin. So for this battle of the 2-in-1s, we’ll be placing the HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) towards the Asus Vivobook 16 Flip to find out which 16-inch convertible is definitely worth the funding.
So, let’s break it down.
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Pricing and configurations

There is only one configuration for the Asus Vivobook 16 Flip, which options an Intel Core Extremely 7 258V processor, built-in Intel Arc 140V graphics, 32GB of on-package reminiscence, a 1TB SSD, and a stunning 16-inch, 2880 x 1800, 120Hz OLED touchscreen. And it prices simply $1,349.
The HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) does sport a discrete Nvidia RTX 40-series GPU choice, so it gives the next top-end worth in comparison with the Vivobook 16 Flip, however the beginning configuration for the Spectre is a extra reasonably priced $1,599.
Our overview configuration prices a staggering $2,059 due to its Intel Core Extremely 7 155H processor, discrete Nvidia RTX 4050 graphics card, 16GB of reminiscence, 1TB SSD, and 16-inch, 2880 x 1800, OLED touchscreen.
The Vivobook gives a more recent, extra environment friendly Intel Core Extremely 7 processor with elevated RAM and a equally luxe OLED show panel. So even if you happen to simply evaluate the bottom Spectre x360 mannequin with the Vivobook, Asus is providing comparable {hardware} at a cheaper price.
As a result of the Vivobook 16 Flip is a greater worth, it has a transparent win right here for pricing.
Winner: Asus Vivobook 16 Flip
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Design

Each 2-in-1 laptops sport sturdy hinges and moveable designs, so this may occasionally come all the way down to a matter of aesthetics.
The Asus Vivobook 16 Flip weighs simply 3.9 kilos and measures 13.98 x 9.62 x 0.67~0.69 inches. The HP Spectre x360 weighs 4.3 kilos and measures 14.05 x 9.67 x 0.78 inches. So the Vivobook is a bit thinner and lighter than the Spectre, however neither goes to be a burden to hold.
As for the aesthetics of the designs, I am keen on the HP Spectre x360’s minimalist design with the angled corners. And within the Slate Blue colorway, the Spectre is a little more eye-catching.
The Vivobook could be very minimalist, in a Matte Grey colorway, and is a bit more understated and boring.
In fact, if you need a laptop computer that blends in, the Vivobook will probably be as unnoticeable as you want. However I like seeing laptops in several colours, and HP’s Slate Blue is enjoyable whereas nonetheless being mature {and professional} sufficient to suit into a wide range of environments.
Winner: HP Spectre x360 16 (2024)
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Battery life

Due to its Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU and 16-inch OLED show, the HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) does not have all-day-plus battery life.
That mentioned, it did final for a good 11 hours and seven minutes on the Laptop computer Magazine net browsing battery check. Whereas not record-breaking, it’s a respectable quantity of battery life for a laptop computer with a discrete GPU and OLED show.
In the meantime, the Asus Vivobook 16 Flip leveraged its environment friendly Intel Lunar Lake processor for prolonged battery life, lasting almost 14 hours (13:47) on the identical battery check.
The Vivobook gives longer battery life in accordance with our testing, and whereas the Spectre does effectively given its specs, battery life holds loads of weight with 2-in-1s. You do not wish to be tethered to an outlet whereas streaming video, browsing the net, or utilizing it as a pill. And you do not want an Nvidia graphics card for that (except you are a creator).
Winner: Asus Vivobook 16 Flip
Click on to view chart knowledge in desk format
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607SA) |
HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
|
Battery life (Increased is healthier) |
13:47 |
11:07 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Show
Not all OLED panels are created equal, however the 2880 x 1800 OLED touchscreens on the HP Spectre x360 and Asus Vivobook 16 Flip are very comparable. They characteristic the identical display dimension, show sort, and even the identical decision.
Each OLEDs profit from an infinite distinction ratio and look improbable whereas streaming or gaming. They’re each shiny and benchmarked equally in our lab assessments.
The HP Spectre’s panel is a bit brighter at 376 nits and a bit extra vibrant, protecting 87.7% of the DCI-P3 colour gamut, however the Vivobook’s show gives a 120Hz refresh price and is a little more correct, with a 0.22 Delta-E.
There are not any actual groundbreaking variations between the 2, and the benchmark disparity in brightness, colour gamut protection, and colour accuracy are inside the realm of ordinary deviation.
Positive, the 120Hz refresh price on the Vivobook does scale back display flicker and may also help offset eye fatigue, however that is not fairly sufficient to push the Vivobook to victory.
Winner: Draw
Click on to view chart knowledge in desk format
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607SA) |
HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
|
Show brightness (Increased is healthier) |
356 |
376 |
|
sRGB colour gamut (Increased is healthier) |
119.2% |
123.0% |
|
DCI-P3 colour gamut (Increased is healthier) |
84.4% |
87.7% |
|
Coloration accuracy (Decrease is healthier) |
0.22 |
0.24 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Efficiency

When it comes to uncooked efficiency energy, you’d count on the HP Spectre x360 (2024) to have the sting. Intel’s Core Extremely 100H Meteor Lake collection was a bit extra highly effective in multicore efficiency in comparison with Intel’s 200V Lunar Lake collection.
And that is true, to a level. In relation to multitasking, the Spectre does provide a slight edge over the Vivobook. Nonetheless, it isn’t an enormous distinction and most of the people will not hit a efficiency wall with the Vivobook.
The HP Spectre x360 can be barely quicker at copying information, nevertheless it’s slower at transcoding video, and it will get a lot hotter than the Vivobook.
Whereas energy customers might want the uncooked computing fringe of the HP Spectre x360, when it comes to total efficiency the Vivobook 16 Flip will simply sustain with the vast majority of duties.
The Vivobook will carry out effectively even when unplugged from an outlet, and it will not get scorching sufficient to singe your legs or danger a fireplace if you happen to put the convertible in your mattress for a late-night Netflix binge.
Winner: Asus Vivobook 16 Flip
Click on to view chart knowledge in desk format
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607SA) |
HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
|
Geekbench 6 (Increased is healthier) |
10,987 |
12,592 |
|
Handbrake conversion (Decrease is healthier) |
07:41 |
9:46 |
|
25GB File Switch Take a look at (Decrease is healthier) |
15.29 |
14.87 |
|
25GB File Switch Take a look at (SSD velocity) |
1,756 |
1,805 |
|
Warmth (Levels Fahrenheit) |
85.8 |
99.3 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip vs. HP Spectre x360 16 (2024): Graphics and gaming

From a pure silicon standpoint, there is not a contest right here. The Asus Vivobook 16 Flip is powered by an built-in Intel graphics tile. The HP Spectre x360 leverages the ability of an Nvidia RTX 4050 discrete GPU.
The RTX 4050 has a gaming edge over the Intel Arc 140V. Nvidia gives years of software program help, supersampling, and frame-generation know-how to extend graphics efficiency. Nonetheless, the Arc 140V places up extra of a combat than we would count on.
Primarily based on our lab testing, the Asus Vivobook 16 Flip almost matches the graphics and gaming efficiency of the HP Spectre x360’s RTX 4050 GPU.
The Flip was just some frames slower than the Spectre on the Civilization VI: Gathering Storm benchmark, and simply 1,500 factors off within the 3DMark Time Spy benchmark. The Vivobook even carried out higher than the HP Spectre x360 on the 3DMark Fireplace Strike benchmark.
That is actually wild and simply goes to indicate that the gaming efficiency of Intel’s Lunar Lake platform is improbable for an iGPU. It is why the brand new Intel-powered handhelds just like the MSI Claw 8 AI+ opted for an AI PC chipset as an alternative of one thing with a bit extra energy.
Winner: HP Spectre x360 16 (2024)
Click on to view chart knowledge in desk format
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Asus Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607SA) |
HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
|
3DMark Fireplace Strike (Increased is healthier) |
8,830 |
1,314 |
|
3DMark Time Spy (Increased is healthier) |
4,292 |
5,810 |
|
Sid Meier’s Civilization VI: Gathering Storm (1080p, fps) |
56.523 |
61.014 |
Backside line
Convertible laptops just like the HP Spectre x360 and Asus Vivobook 16 Flip are a part of why we’re so choosy about our finest 2-in-1 laptops. Each are highly effective machines with gorgeous OLED shows. Whereas they don’t seem to be price range convertibles in any sense, they’re definitely worth the funding.
Not a single one in every of these classes was an open-and-shut win for the Vivobook or the Spectre. Actually, most of them may have been thought-about a draw. These are two very well-matched 2-in-1 laptops.
Nonetheless, the Vivobook is cheaper and options higher battery life, a stunning show, dependable efficiency, and gaming energy that just about matches the Spectre’s RTX 4050 GPU.
So whereas the Spectre seems a bit nicer, is available in a enjoyable Slate Blue colorway, and helps a uncooked multicore efficiency and graphics edge, it simply cannot justify its worth or decrease battery life sufficient to take dwelling the win.
Winner: Asus Vivobook 16 Flip


