You might need seen our launch evaluate of this new Montech HyperFlow Silent AIO go up on YouTube a few weeks in the past, however then it was eliminated. Earlier than we get into the principle video, we wished to clarify rapidly what occurred. Throughout our evaluation we discovered what we thought-about a fairly main design difficulty with this new cooler and reported again to Montech, and a few days later they requested us if we wouldnt thoughts retesting with a second pattern they had been going to ship. Whereas we knew our first pattern was not broken in any manner, we gave them the advantage of the doubt and agreed to republish later. What you’ll watch subsequent is our outcomes over a number of weeks of indepth testing and we additionally examined the 2nd pattern final week to verify findings.
The HyperFlow Silent is suitable with all present Intel and AMD desktop platforms, starting from Intel 115X as much as the newest Intel 1851 socket. And it is suitable with AMD, AM3, AM4, AM5. You get the higher mounting bracket for AMD set up, two Intel backplates – one for LGA 1700 and 1851 sockets – after which one for 115X, 1200 and so forth.
Whereas different publications who’ve already examined this cooler seem to have used Intel platforms, we discovered efficiency of the cooler on an AMD 9950X to be relatively disappointing. Particularly contemplating the Arctic Liquid Freezer 3, the MSI MAG CoreLiquid i360, and the Be Quiet Mild loop had been all outperforming it with decrease fan velocity and noise output. Even the unique HyperFlow ARGB measured 6 levels cooler, too.
Lowering noise output to 40 decibels places every thing on a stage enjoying discipline and the true thermal efficiency might be measured. However once more, the HyperFlow Silent is on the backside of the pile out of the coolers we now have examined to this point on the 9950X. It is a huge 8 levels C hotter than the Lian Li HydroShift LCD360S, 6 levels off its older brother, the unique HyperFlow ARGB, and even the Arctic Liquid Freezer 3, which makes use of an virtually similar fan velocity at 40 decibels.
So efficiency of our pattern on AMD is disappointing. To validate these figures we ran the identical check a number of occasions and the HyperFlow Silent was inside a level both manner every time. The one anomaly we famous was how the mounting stress and thermal paste unfold taken care of every mount. Upon elimination of the cooler, the thermal paste appeared noticeably thicker on the proper hand aspect of the CPU, so it is doubtless that the contact wasn’t excellent.
To take issues additional, we additionally checked efficiency on our new Intel Core Extremely 9 285K system. The efficiency hole between the unique HyperFlow ARGB and the HyperFlow Silent Is far nearer right here at most fan velocity, however with noise normalised at 40 decibels, the unique hyper movement ARGB cooler outperformed the Silent, however solely by three levels C – that means the deficit is halved this time. Nevertheless, this was solely a fast experiment to offer suggestions on efficiency to Montech, so these are to not be classed as official check figures, and we’re nonetheless engaged on gathering information for this platform.
At this level, it was clear to us that efficiency on AMD AM5 CPUs did not appear so as to add up. However KitGuru reviewer and cooling skilled James Dawson thought he had the answer after weeks of in-depth testing and evaluation. In addition to altering followers between the unique HyperFlow ARGB and this new Silent model, there had been one other {hardware} change, and that is the higher mounting bracket used for AMD AM4, AM5 set up.
The brand new Silent cooler makes use of a 4 level mounting system. This slides onto the CPU block, after which it is mounted to the CPU socket. As an alternative of those 4 factors utilizing spring loaded screws, the older ARGB cooler makes use of a two level mounting system with two hooks that mount on to the plastic higher mounting bracket that comes pre-installed to AMD motherboards.
Picture credit score: Anandtech
If you happen to consider the AMD die format of the CPU, there’s the 2 smaller CCD dies aspect by aspect (as proven above). So, with this mounting system, the likelihood of getting a poor mount or uneven mounting stress aspect to aspect, is larger than with the unique system. In a nutshell, relying on how the screws are tightened, there’s potential for a uneven mount. To re-iterate, that is important for AM5 CPUs just like the 9950X with the aspect by aspect format of the CCDs.
With that in thoughts, James truly re-mounted the cooler utilizing the older 2 level mount from Montech’s authentic HyperFlow ARGB cooler, and ran the thermal assessments once more.
You possibly can see above that reverting again to the ARGB mount with the Silent 360 has a big affect on thermal efficiency. At most fan velocity, utilizing the HyperFlow ARGB mount brings the common temperature of the Silence 360 cooler down by an enormous 7 levels C, and that places efficiency extra in keeping with the unique HyperFlow ARGB. It is finally the identical story when the fan velocity is lowered to 40 decibels noise output, the place utilizing the unique ARGB mount on the Silent 360 brings the efficiency stage of this new cooler in-line with the unique ARGB cooler. That is what we had been anticipating from the outset contemplating each coolers use the identical core design.
We reached out to Montech and defined what we would discovered when it comes to efficiency between the brand new Silent 360 and the unique ARGB cooler. They then carried out a few of their very own testing and located related outcomes. Montech then set the next assertion:
“After reviewing James’ suggestions and conducting extra inside testing, we’ve recognized that the poor AMD efficiency is basically because of the new mount.”
Montech went on to say:
“Consequently, we’ve made the choice to carry all unshipped items and revert to the ARGB model’s authentic mount. For items which have already been shipped or are on retailer cabinets, we are going to present clients with the up to date mount upon request—no questions requested—by way of [email protected].”
At this level we felt we had been absolutely capable of share our findings with the readers and viewers and printed the video evaluate on Thursday twenty seventh February. Commentary from the general public appeared optimistic and the viewers had been glad that Montech had been actioning potential replacements for these coolers to rectify efficiency points on AMD platforms.
Nevertheless, on Friday twenty eighth February, Montech requested us if we might take the video evaluate down as they wished us to check a second unit, suggesting that our authentic mannequin’s radiator might have been broken and that subsequent efficiency information indicated the difficulty could possibly be extra advanced than simply an replace to the mounting system. We’re fairly assured based mostly on checking the cooler extensively earlier than testing that it has obtained no harm throughout delivery.
We had been requested to attend for a substitute unit, with Montech’s up to date mounting system, as any buyer will obtain it when ordering on-line. Whether or not it is going to be precisely the identical as the unique ARGB cooler’s mounting system, or if it is going to be tweaked not directly, we’re unable to verify till we obtain a brand new unit ourselves.
UPDATE: we retested with a second model of the cooler – the video above exhibits the outcomes and our technical information gained during the last month
For these clients who’ve a model of this cooler with out an up to date mount, you possibly can nonetheless electronic mail Montech to get a substitute on the electronic mail handle above, which is able to hopefully enhance cooling efficiency on the AMD platforms.
KitGuru says: We hope Montech will take our advise and findings onboard and ship a revised model of this cooler.
