At 2.80 kilos and 16.45 millimeters at its thickest level, the Dell Professional 7 14 Intel is without doubt one of the thinnest laptops Dell has put in its industrial Professional line, as much as 17 % slimmer than the 14-inch clamshell era it replaces. The shell pairs an aluminum prime cowl and palm relaxation with a magnesium backside door, and inside Dell matches a Sequence 3 Intel Core Extremely 7 366H with Intel vPro, a 16-core chip with a 50 TOPS NPU, alongside 64GB of LPDDR5x-8533 reminiscence and a 1 TB PCIe Gen5 SSD. Additionally it is the most costly machine on this four-laptop take a look at group at $5,600 as configured, a Dell.com single-unit worth that fleet patrons will sometimes negotiate down.

This laptop computer posted the very best total PCMark 10 rating within the group at 8,438, took the highest Digital Content material Creation subscore, ran for 26 hours and 18 minutes in our Trendy Workplace battery take a look at, and its SK hynix Gen5 SSD led 3DMark Storage with a rating of three,259 and skim at almost 8.4 GB/s. It recorded the bottom sustained multi-core outcomes of the 4 in Cinebench and 7-Zip, and its built-in Intel Graphics completed behind the Radeon 890M within the Dell Professional 7 14 AMD and Dell Professional 5 16 AMD throughout most SPECviewperf viewsets. The sharpest comparability comes from throughout the household: the nominally lower-tier Professional 5 14 Intel carries a higher-tier Core Extremely X7 368H and Arc B390 graphics for $108 much less, and it wins many of the GPU and AI exams.

The case for the Professional 7 14 Intel rests on all the things wrapped round these numbers. Intel vPro brings AMT out-of-band administration, {Hardware} Protect, and Menace Detection Expertise, layered below Dell SafeBIOS, quantum-resistant BIOS verification, and Trusted System, with 36 months of ProSupport Subsequent Enterprise Day Onsite service and sturdiness testing past commonplace MIL-STD necessities. Executives and cellular professionals who depend grams and unplugged hours greater than render minutes are the target market, and this evaluation examines whether or not the lightest Professional earns its premium over its siblings.
Design and Construct
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel makes use of the identical compact chassis because the AMD mannequin, pairing an aluminum prime cowl and palm relaxation with a light-weight magnesium backside door. Dell calls it the thinnest 14-inch pocket book in its present Professional lineup, measuring 10.3 mm on the entrance and as much as 16.45 mm at its thickest level. Additionally it is as much as 17% thinner than the earlier 14-inch clamshell era.

The darkish grey end and easy form match the enterprise focus, however the metallic building retains it from feeling flimsy. Dell says the chassis has been examined past commonplace MIL-STD necessities, which is helpful for a system more likely to spend a lot of its time being carried between workplaces, assembly rooms, and airports.

Show and Enter
Our evaluation unit has a 14-inch WUXGA show with a 1920 x 1200 decision and a taller 16:10 side ratio. The non-touch panel helps a variable refresh fee from 1 to 120 Hz, reaches 500 nits, covers 100% of the sRGB shade area, and makes use of an anti-glare end. Additionally it is one among Dell’s super-low-power panels, which seemingly helped the system final 26 hours and 18 minutes in our PCMark 10 Trendy Workplace battery take a look at proven beneath.
Dell consists of ComfortView Plus to scale back blue-light output with out making use of the heavy yellow tint related to some software program filters. Textual content and interface components stay sharp at this decision, whereas the 120 Hz most refresh fee makes scrolling and normal navigation really feel smoother than on a normal 60 Hz enterprise show.

The Mini-LED backlit keyboard is spill-resistant and features a devoted AI key. The format makes use of the out there width properly, with full-sized major keys and no numeric keypad taking on area on the best. A big, precision touchpad sits beneath it, offering sufficient area for multi-finger gestures.

Above the show is an 8MP RGB HDR and infrared digicam able to recording at 1440p and 30 frames per second. It helps Home windows Hi there facial recognition, presence detection, and temporal noise discount, and features a bodily shutter for privateness.
Ports and Connectivity
Port choice is nice for a laptop computer this skinny. The left facet has two Thunderbolt 4 Sort-C ports supporting USB4 at as much as 40Gbps, DisplayPort 2.1, and Energy Supply. HDMI 2.1 and a USB 3.2 Gen 1 Sort-A port with PowerShare are additionally situated on this facet.

Our configuration provides a 3rd USB Sort-C port on the best. This connection helps USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 at as much as 20Gbps, DisplayPort 1.4, and Energy Supply. Dell provides it as an alternative choice to a second USB Sort-A port with PowerShare, so the precise format is determined by the chosen configuration. The best facet additionally consists of the headset jack, wedge-shaped safety slot, and an elective nano-SIM tray, whereas an elective smart-card reader slot is situated on the left on supported configurations.

Wi-fi connectivity is supplied by an Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 2×2 adapter, certified in opposition to Bluetooth Core 6.0. The laptop computer expenses by USB-C utilizing the included 65W adapter, which will be related to both facet. Its 70Wh battery helps ExpressCharge and ExpressCharge Increase, although Dell notes each fast-charging modes require not less than a 100W adapter, so the bundled 65W unit expenses at commonplace velocity.
Safety and Manageability
The primary distinction between this technique and the in any other case comparable Professional 7 14 AMD is Intel vPro. Intel Lively Administration Expertise supplies out-of-band entry that may permit IT workers to diagnose, configure, and help a system even when its working system is unavailable. That may be significantly beneficial for corporations managing laptops throughout a number of workplaces or supporting staff working remotely.

Intel {Hardware} Protect provides protections beneath the working system, whereas Menace Detection Expertise may help safety software program establish sure assaults. Intel’s Steady IT Platform Program additionally supplies companies with a extra predictable {hardware} and driver platform for large-scale deployments.
Dell provides its personal safety and administration options by SafeBIOS, Trusted System, and quantum-resistant BIOS verification. Our configuration features a fingerprint reader built-in into the facility button, an infrared digicam for Home windows Hi there, a bodily digicam shutter, and TPM 2.0 licensed to FIPS 140-3 necessities.
Dell Administration Portal can work with Microsoft Intune to handle Dell-specific settings from an current cloud-management setting. Our evaluation configuration additionally consists of 36 months of ProSupport with Subsequent Enterprise Day Onsite service following distant prognosis.
Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel) Specs
| Specification | Dell Professional 7 14 (P714260) |
|---|---|
| Platform Overview | |
| Processor | Sequence 3 Intel Core Extremely 7 366H with Intel vPro 16 cores, as much as 4.8 GHz 50 TOPS NPU (Copilot+ PC) |
| Graphics | Intel Graphics (built-in, 4 Xe cores) |
| Working System | Home windows 11 Professional (Copilot+ PC) |
| Reminiscence and Storage | |
| Reminiscence | 64 GB LPDDR5x-8533, dual-channel, onboard |
| Storage | 1 TB Efficiency SSD, PCIe Gen5, SED Prepared (SK hynix PCB01) |
| Show and Digital camera | |
| Show | 14″ WUXGA (1920 x 1200), non-touch, VRR 1 to 120 Hz 500 nits, 100% sRGB, ComfortView Plus, anti-glare, super-low-power |
| Digital camera | 8 MP RGB HDR + IR, 1440p at 30 fps Presence Detection, Temporal Noise Discount, Digital camera Shutter |
| Connectivity and Enter | |
| Wi-fi | Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211, 2×2, Bluetooth Core 6.0 |
| Keyboard | Mini-LED backlit, AI hotkey, spill resistant, US English |
| Ports | 2x Thunderbolt 4/USB4 (40Gbps) Sort-C with Energy Supply and DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (20Gbps) Sort-C with Energy Supply and DisplayPort 1.4 (as configured; various is a second USB 3.2 Gen 1 Sort-A with PowerShare) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Sort-A with PowerShare 1x HDMI 2.1 1x world headset port 1x wedge-shaped lock slot Non-compulsory nano-SIM tray and smart-card reader slot |
| Safety and Manageability | |
| Safety | Fingerprint reader in energy button (Home windows Hi there) TPM 2.0 FIPS 140-3 / TCG Licensed Quantum-resistant BIOS verification, digicam shutter |
| Manageability | Intel vPro (AMT, {Hardware} Protect, TDT, SIPP) Dell SafeBIOS, Trusted System, Dell Administration Portal, Intune |
| Energy and Bodily | |
| Battery | 3-cell, 70 Wh, ExpressCharge / ExpressCharge Increase |
| Energy Adapter | 65 W USB-C |
| Chassis | Aluminum prime cowl and palmrest, magnesium backside cowl From 2.80 lb; 10.3 to 16.45 mm thick |
| Certifications, Guarantee and Pricing | |
| Certifications | ENERGY STAR, EPEAT Gold with Local weather+, TCO Licensed Examined past commonplace MIL-STD necessities |
| Service | Dell ProSupport, Subsequent Enterprise Day Onsite, 36 months |
| Base Value | $2,359 |
| Value as Examined | $5,600 (Dell.com single-unit, no low cost) |
Efficiency
To see how the Dell Professional 7 14 Intel matches inside Dell’s present industrial lineup, we examined it alongside the Professional 5 14 Intel and each AMD configurations. All 4 laptops ran our commonplace energy profile throughout normal productiveness, CPU rendering, GPU compute, skilled visualization, storage, AI, and battery workloads.
Though the 2 Intel laptops are constructed on the identical Sequence 3 Core Extremely platform, they don’t seem to be equals: the Professional 7 14’s Core Extremely 7 366H and commonplace Intel Graphics surrender floor to the Professional 5 14’s higher-tier X7 368H and Arc B390 in most GPU and AI exams. Comparisons with the AMD pair break up by workload, with the Intel machines forward in Blender GPU rendering and AI textual content era, whereas the Radeon 890M programs lead most SPECviewperf CAD viewsets.
Take a look at Techniques
| Specification | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (12C/24T) | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (12C/24T) | Core Extremely 7 366H (16C) | Core Extremely X7 368H (16C) |
| GPU | Radeon 890M | Radeon 890M | Intel Graphics | Intel Arc B390 |
| Reminiscence | 64 GB DDR5-5600 | 64 GB LPDDR5x-8533 | 64 GB LPDDR5x-8533 | 64 GB LPCAMM2-8533 |
| Storage | SanDisk PC SN5100S 1 TB | Samsung BM9C1a 1 TB | SK hynix PCB01 1 TB | SK hynix PCB01 1 TB |
| Show | 16″ WQXGA | 14″ WUXGA | 14″ WUXGA | 14″ WUXGA |
| Value as Examined | $4,648 | $5,377 | $5,600 | $5,492 |
UL Procyon: AI Laptop Imaginative and prescient
The Procyon AI Laptop Imaginative and prescient Benchmark measures AI inference efficiency throughout CPUs, GPUs, and devoted accelerators utilizing a spread of state-of-the-art neural networks. It evaluates duties comparable to picture classification, object detection, segmentation, and super-resolution utilizing fashions together with MobileNet V3, Inception V4, YOLO V3, DeepLab V3, Actual ESRGAN, and ResNet 50. Checks are run on a number of inference engines, together with NVIDIA TensorRT, Intel OpenVINO, Qualcomm SNPE, Microsoft Home windows ML, and Apple Core ML, offering a broad view of {hardware} and software program effectivity. Outcomes are reported for float- and integer-optimized fashions, offering a constant, sensible measure of machine imaginative and prescient efficiency for skilled workloads.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel carried out a lot better on the CPU facet of the AI Laptop Imaginative and prescient benchmark, with an total rating of 121 that led the group by a slim margin. It additionally posted the quickest ends in DeepLab V3 and YOLO V3, although the Professional 5 14 Intel was faster in MobileNet V3, ResNet 50, Inception V4, and REAL-ESRGAN. GPU efficiency was much less aggressive, with an total rating of 205, putting it behind each Radeon 890M programs and properly beneath the Professional 5 14 Intel’s rating of 398. The Professional 7 14 Intel did lead the AMD laptops in a number of particular person GPU workloads, however its gradual REAL-ESRGAN results of 1,309.49 ms pulled down the general rating.
| CPU Outcomes (common time in ms) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Laptop Imaginative and prescient Total Rating | 91 | 77 | 121 | 119 |
| MobileNet V3 | 1.57 ms | 1.79 ms | 1.24 ms | 1.09 ms |
| ResNet 50 | 13.64 ms | 16.46 ms | 11.57 ms | 10.11 ms |
| Inception V4 | 40.43 ms | 51.10 ms | 34.01 ms | 29.77 ms |
| DeepLab V3 | 69.73 ms | 74.74 ms | 37.98 ms | 50.18 ms |
| YOLO V3 | 99.38 ms | 122.35 ms | 81.22 ms | 112.64 ms |
| REAL-ESRGAN | 4,504.35 ms | 5,383.21 ms | 3,163.45 ms | 2,884.51 ms |
| GPU Outcomes (common time in ms) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Laptop Imaginative and prescient Total Rating | 214 | 243 | 205 | 398 |
| MobileNet V3 | 1.56 ms | 1.17 ms | 1.04 ms | 0.84 ms |
| ResNet 50 | 8.76 ms | 7.93 ms | 6.52 ms | 2.94 ms |
| Inception V4 | 22.46 ms | 20.06 ms | 20.72 ms | 8.38 ms |
| DeepLab V3 | 38.40 ms | 34.04 ms | 26.53 ms | 17.54 ms |
| YOLO V3 | 23.56 ms | 21.92 ms | 43.07 ms | 19.14 ms |
| REAL-ESRGAN | 570.35 ms | 536.81 ms | 1,309.49 ms | 562.87 ms |
UL Procyon: AI Textual content Technology
The Procyon AI Textual content Technology Benchmark streamlines LLM efficiency testing by offering a concise, constant analysis technique. It permits repeated testing throughout a number of LLM fashions whereas minimizing the complexity of enormous fashions and the variety of variables. Developed with AI {hardware} leaders, it optimizes using native AI accelerators to ship extra dependable, environment friendly efficiency assessments.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel completed comfortably forward of each AMD programs throughout all 4 AI Textual content Technology workloads, with scores of 689 on Phi, 525 on Mistral, 509 on Llama3, and 530 on Llama2. It additionally produced decrease time-to-first-token outcomes and better token-generation charges all through the take a look at. The Professional 5 14 Intel was quicker throughout all workloads, with its higher-tier processor main by about 21% in Llama2 and 39% in Llama3. That mentioned, the Professional 7 14 Intel supplied a noticeable enchancment over the AMD fashions for native LLM workloads.
| UL Procyon: AI Textual content Technology | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phi | ||||
| Phi Total Rating | 371 | 427 | 689 | 904 |
| Phi Output Time To First Token | 5.052 s | 4.286 s | 1.843 s | 1.158 s |
| Phi Output Tokens Per Second | 27.163 tokens/s | 30.492 tokens/s | 34.172 tokens/s | 36.952 tokens/s |
| Phi Total Period | 135.343 s | 118.697 s | 92.273 s | 81.304 s |
| Mistral | ||||
| Mistral Total Rating | 346 | 389 | 525 | 716 |
| Mistral Output Time To First Token | 6.929 s | 6.060 s | 3.778 s | 2.195 s |
| Mistral Output Tokens Per Second | 18.174 tokens/s | 20.125 tokens/s | 22.843 tokens/s | 24.724 tokens/s |
| Mistral Total Period | 196.185 s | 176.220 s | 143.831 s | 123.773 s |
| Llama3 | ||||
| Llama3 Total Rating | 306 | 345 | 509 | 708 |
| Llama3 Output Time To First Token | 6.518 s | 5.707 s | 2.992 s | 1.657 s |
| Llama3 Output Tokens Per Second | 15.050 tokens/s | 16.725 tokens/s | 19.104 tokens/s | 20.421 tokens/s |
| Llama3 Total Period | 224.176 s | 199.931 s | 161.290 s | 142.814 s |
| Llama2 | ||||
| Llama2 Total Rating | 329 | 367 | 530 | 641 |
| Llama2 Output Time To First Token | 11.089 s | 10.307 s | 5.412 s | 4.082 s |
| Llama2 Output Tokens Per Second | 8.878 tokens/s | 10.260 tokens/s | 11.230 tokens/s | 12.397 tokens/s |
| Llama2 Total Period | 381.464 s | 334.648 s | 278.109 s | 245.572 s |
UL Procyon: AI Picture Technology
The Procyon AI Picture Technology Benchmark supplies a constant and correct technique for measuring AI inference efficiency throughout a spread of {hardware}, from low-power NPUs to high-end GPUs. It consists of three exams: Steady Diffusion XL (FP16) for high-end GPUs, Steady Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) for reasonably highly effective GPUs, and Steady Diffusion 1.5 (INT8) for low-power gadgets. The benchmark makes use of the optimum inference engine for every system, guaranteeing truthful and comparable outcomes.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel was positioned close to the 2 AMD programs within the Steady Diffusion 1.5 exams, scoring 258 in FP16 and three,575 in INT8. These outcomes had been solely barely forward of or behind the AMD laptops, with image-generation occasions separated by a few second or much less in each workloads. It pulled additional forward in Steady Diffusion XL, the place its rating of 268 was about 51% larger than the Professional 7 14 AMD’s 177, and its 139.410-second image-generation time was significantly quicker. The Professional 5 14 Intel nonetheless led each take a look at by a large margin, making the distinction between the 2 Intel graphics configurations particularly noticeable right here.
| UL Procyon: AI Picture Technology | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) | ||||
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) – Total Rating | 255 | 247 | 258 | 635 |
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) – Total Time | 391.577 s | 404.455 s | 386.614 s | 157.296 s |
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (FP16) – Picture Technology Velocity | 24.474 s/picture | 25.278 s/picture | 24.163 s/picture | 9.831 s/picture |
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (INT8) | ||||
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (INT8) – Total Rating | 3,598 | 3,521 | 3,575 | 7,693 |
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (INT8) – Total Time | 69.478 s | 70.985 s | 69.911 s | 32.495 s |
| Steady Diffusion 1.5 (INT8) – Picture Technology Velocity | 8.685 s/picture | 8.873 s/picture | 8.739 s/picture | 4.062 s/picture |
| Steady Diffusion XL (FP16) | ||||
| Steady Diffusion XL (FP16) – Total Rating | 173 | 177 | 268 | 646 |
| Steady Diffusion XL (FP16) – Total Time | 3,448.478 s | 3,379.388 s | 2,230.563 s | 928.747 s |
| Steady Diffusion XL (FP16) – Picture Technology Velocity | 215.530 s/picture | 211.212 s/picture | 139.410 s/picture | 58.047 s/picture |
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 measures normal system efficiency throughout on a regular basis work comparable to net looking, video conferencing, spreadsheets, writing, photograph modifying, and rendering. Greater scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel posted the very best total PCMark 10 rating of the group at 8,438, putting it about 2% forward of each AMD programs and 6% forward of the Professional 5 14 Intel. It additionally led the Necessities take a look at with 10,981 and took first place in Digital Content material Creation with 10,610, holding an 8% benefit over the next-fastest system. Its Productiveness rating of 13,992 was barely behind the AMD laptops, however the total consequence reveals that it delivers wonderful responsiveness throughout widespread workplace and content-creation duties.
| PCMark 10 (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 8,268 | 8,237 | 8,438 | 7,945 |
| Necessities | 10,870 | 10,783 | 10,981 | 10,751 |
| Productiveness | 14,322 | 14,366 | 13,992 | 13,821 |
| Digital Content material Creation | 9,852 | 9,792 | 10,610 | 9,158 |
Geekbench 6
Geekbench 6 measures processor efficiency utilizing a mixture of widespread duties, with separate scores for single-core and multi-core workloads. Greater scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel scored 2,862 in Geekbench 6 single-core, putting it final within the group however solely about 4% behind the main Professional 5 16 AMD. Its multi-core rating of 16,787 was much more aggressive, ending inside 1% of the Professional 5 14 Intel and round 14% forward of each AMD programs. This was one of many stronger multi-core outcomes for the Professional 7 14 Intel, exhibiting that its Core Extremely 7 366H can carry out properly in shorter, blended workloads, despite the fact that it falls behind in longer, sustained exams.
| Geekbench 6 (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Core | 2,989 | 2,888 | 2,862 | 2,968 |
| Multi-Core | 14,348 | 14,768 | 16,787 | 16,874 |
Cinebench R23 and 2024
Cinebench measures how rapidly the processor can render a fancy scene, with separate exams for single-core and multi-core efficiency. Greater scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel delivered robust single-core efficiency in Cinebench R23, main the group with a rating of two,043, however its multi-core rating of 14,640 was the bottom of the 4 programs. The identical sample carried over to Cinebench 2024, the place its single-core rating of 116 was aggressive, however its multi-core rating of 683 positioned it properly behind the opposite laptops. The Professional 5 14 Intel completed about 16% forward in R23 multi-core and 18% forward in Cinebench 2024 multi-core, whereas the bigger Professional 5 16 AMD prolonged these results in 28% and 54%, respectively.
| Cinebench (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R23 Single-Core | 2,029 | 1,946 | 2,043 | 2,010 |
| R23 Multi-Core | 18,764 | 15,173 | 14,640 | 16,915 |
| 2024 Single-Core | 119 | 105 | 116 | 122 |
| 2024 Multi-Core | 1,055 | 847 | 683 | 807 |
7-Zip Compression
The 7-Zip benchmark measures how rapidly the processor can compress and decompress knowledge utilizing a number of threads. Greater GIPS scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel recorded a complete score of 81.2 GIPS within the 7-Zip benchmark, putting it final among the many 4 programs. It trailed the Professional 5 14 Intel by about 9%, the Professional 7 14 AMD by 10%, and the bigger Professional 5 16 AMD by 22%. The consequence follows the identical development seen in Cinebench, with the skinny chassis limiting the Core Extremely 7 366H throughout workloads that preserve all of its cores busy for an prolonged interval.
| 7-Zip (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Score (GIPS) | 103.9 | 90.2 | 81.2 | 89.4 |
y-cruncher
y-cruncher measures how rapidly the processor can calculate massive numbers of Pi digits, putting a heavy load on the CPU and reminiscence. Outcomes are measured in seconds, so decrease occasions are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel was the slowest system throughout all three y-cruncher workloads, finishing the 1-billion-digit calculation in 34.775 seconds, the two.5-billion-digit take a look at in 104.586 seconds, and the 5-billion-digit take a look at in 240.554 seconds. The Professional 5 14 Intel was round 15% quicker all through, whereas the 2 Ryzen programs prolonged their benefit because the workload elevated. At 5 billion digits, the Professional 5 16 AMD accomplished the calculation roughly 32% quicker, which reveals the distinction between the Professional 7 14’s moveable design and the bigger AMD system’s sustained CPU efficiency.
| y-cruncher — seconds (decrease is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Billion | 25.160 | 25.199 | 34.775 | 29.405 |
| 2.5 Billion | 73.320 | 79.393 | 104.586 | 90.719 |
| 5 Billion | 163.768 | 177.776 | 240.554 | 204.685 |
Blender 5.1.1 (GPU)
The Blender benchmark measures GPU rendering efficiency utilizing three completely different 3D scenes: Monster, Junkshop, and Classroom. Outcomes are reported in samples per minute, so larger scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel carried out properly in Blender in contrast with the Radeon 890M programs, reaching 253.6 samples per minute in Monster, 189.3 in Junkshop, and 153.0 in Classroom. These outcomes positioned it round 45% to 80% forward of the Professional 7 14 AMD, relying on the scene. The Professional 5 14 Intel’s Arc B390 was significantly quicker nonetheless, main the Professional 7 14 Intel by 45% in Monster, 65% in Junkshop, and 60% in Classroom. This provides the Professional 7 14 Intel a strong benefit over the AMD laptops for Blender GPU rendering, although it can not match the higher-tier Intel graphics configuration.
| Blender 5.1.1 GPU — samples/min (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monster | 129.8 | 140.9 | 253.6 | 366.6 |
| Junkshop | 103.1 | 122.0 | 189.3 | 312.6 |
| Classroom | 91.1 | 105.6 | 153.0 | 244.4 |
V-Ray and LuxMark
LuxMark measures GPU compute efficiency by rendering complicated scenes by OpenCL, whereas V-Ray GPU measures how rapidly the graphics processor can render a scene utilizing the V-Ray engine. Greater scores are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel produced blended ends in V-Ray and LuxMark. Its LuxMark Corridor rating of two,168 was the very best exterior the Professional 5 14 Intel and narrowly forward of each AMD programs, however its Meals rating of 880 positioned it final. The identical was true in V-Ray, the place its results of 775 vpaths was barely behind the Professional 7 14 AMD and round 16% beneath the Professional 5 14 Intel. Total, its commonplace Intel Graphics supplied sufficient compute efficiency to compete with the Radeon 890M in some workloads, however outcomes assorted significantly by software.
| GPU Compute (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LuxMark — Corridor | 2,125 | 2,042 | 2,168 | 3,287 |
| LuxMark — Meals | 982 | 1,050 | 880 | 1,585 |
| V-Ray GPU (vpaths) | 861 | 784 | 775 | 919 |
SPECviewperf 15
SPECviewperf 15 measures graphics efficiency utilizing viewsets derived from skilled functions in CAD, 3D modeling, rendering, engineering, and medical visualization. Greater scores are higher, though efficiency can range significantly between functions and graphics architectures.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel struggled all through SPECviewperf 15, posting the bottom lead to many of the skilled visualization viewsets. The most important gaps appeared in CAD-focused exams comparable to CATIA, Creo, Power, Siemens NX, and SolidWorks, the place the Radeon 890M programs had been usually a number of occasions quicker. It was extra aggressive in Enscape, Maya, and Unreal Engine, however the Professional 5 14 Intel additionally completed properly forward in these exams. These outcomes make the Professional 7 14 Intel not an incredible match for customers who recurrently work in CAD, engineering, or different GPU-heavy skilled functions.
| SPECviewperf 15 (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3dsmax-08 | 23.21 | 24.69 | 9.58 | 20.21 |
| blender-01 | 19.89 | 20.85 | 9.11 | 21.19 |
| catia-07 | 20.16 | 21.21 | 5.27 | 10.27 |
| creo-04 | 44.27 | 45.70 | 18.27 | 32.53 |
| energy-04 | 25.39 | 25.08 | 3.68 | 10.78 |
| enscape-01 | 8.02 | 8.29 | 6.22 | 14.28 |
| maya-07 | 48.67 | 53.64 | 49.54 | 82.42 |
| medical-04 | 65.45 | 60.50 | 9.91 | 22.96 |
| snx-05 | 51.67 | 51.84 | 37.74 | 46.22 |
| solidworks-08 | 33.12 | 32.02 | 11.86 | 23.60 |
| unreal_engine-01 | 26.61 | 26.29 | 21.36 | 38.77 |
SPECworkstation 4
SPECworkstation 4 measures workstation efficiency throughout CPU, graphics, storage, AI, product design, engineering, monetary providers, and different skilled workloads. Greater scores are higher, whereas DNF means the system didn’t full each workload required for that class.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel produced a extra balanced set of ends in SPECworkstation 4, scoring 1.08 within the CPU subsystem and 1.68 in storage, ending near or forward of many of the group. Graphics was its weakest space at 0.82, properly behind each Radeon 890M programs and roughly half the rating of the Professional 5 14 Intel. It additionally positioned final in AI and Machine Studying, Power, and Life Sciences, and tied the Professional 5 14 on the backside of Monetary Providers, although it was the one system within the group to finish the Media and Leisure workload, posting a 1.16 there. The robust storage rating helped, however weaker graphics efficiency restricted it throughout many broader workstation workloads.
| SPECworkstation 4 (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU (subsystem) | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.19 |
| Graphics (subsystem) | 2.36 | 2.41 | 0.82 | 1.68 |
| Storage (subsystem) | 0.89 | 0.55 | 1.68 | 1.76 |
| AI & Machine Studying | 1.37 | 1.29 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Power | 1.24 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 1.18 |
| Monetary Providers | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Life Sciences | 1.34 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.34 |
| Media & Leisure | DNF | DNF | 1.16 | DNF |
| Product Design | 1.34 | 1.18 | 1.41 | 1.64 |
| Productiveness & Improvement | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.04 | 1.10 |
Storage Efficiency
3DMark Storage measures how an SSD performs throughout gaming-related duties comparable to loading video games, putting in software program, saving progress, and shifting recreation information. Blackmagic Disk Velocity Take a look at measures an SSD’s sequential learn and write speeds utilizing massive media information.
The SK hynix PCB01 within the Dell Professional 7 14 Intel delivered a few of the strongest storage ends in the group, main 3DMark Storage with a rating of three,259. It additionally reached 8,398.6 MB/s learn and eight,934.5 MB/s write within the Blackmagic Disk Velocity Take a look at, giving it the quickest write consequence and putting it simply behind the Professional 5 14 Intel in sequential reads. In contrast with the Professional 7 14 AMD, the Intel mannequin was greater than 3 times quicker in 3DMark Storage and greater than doubled its sequential write velocity.
| Storage (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Storage (rating) | 2,477 | 894 | 3,259 | 3,144 |
| Blackmagic Disk — Learn (MB/s) | 4,758.0 | 3,103.4 | 8,398.6 | 8,609.6 |
| Blackmagic Disk — Write (MB/s) | 5,166.5 | 4,034.3 | 8,934.5 | 8,747.3 |
Battery Life
The PCMark 10 Trendy Workplace battery take a look at repeatedly runs widespread workplace duties till the battery reaches the take a look at’s cutoff level. Longer runtimes are higher.
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel lasted 26 hours and 18 minutes within the PCMark 10 Trendy Workplace battery take a look at, solely half-hour behind the Professional 5 14 Intel and almost seven hours longer than the Professional 7 14 AMD. It additionally outlasted the bigger Professional 5 16 AMD by virtually 11 hours. This was among the finest ends in the evaluation and a serious benefit for anybody who recurrently works away from an influence outlet.
| Battery — PCMark 10 Trendy Workplace (larger is healthier) | Dell Professional 5 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12C) | Dell Professional 7 14 (Intel Core Extremely 7 366H 16C) | Dell Professional 5 14 (Intel Core Extremely X7 368H 16C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runtime | 15h 22m | 19h 28m | 26h 18m | 26h 48m |
Conclusion
The Dell Professional 7 14 Intel is the laptop computer Dell constructed for the highway, and judged on these phrases, it delivers. It shares the thinnest chassis in Dell’s industrial line with its AMD twin at 2.80 kilos and 16.45 mm, ran 26 hours and 18 minutes in PCMark 10 Trendy Workplace, almost seven hours longer than that twin, and posted the very best total PCMark 10 rating of the group at 8,438 with the highest Digital Content material Creation subscore. Its Gen5 SSD led 3DMark Storage at 3,259 and skim at almost 8.4GB/s, and Intel vPro brings AMT out-of-band entry, {Hardware} Protect, Menace Detection Expertise, and SIPP, a administration depth the AMD pair can not match, although the Professional 5 14 shares it. For a workday of paperwork, browsers, video calls, and airports, that is the strongest machine within the group.

Sustained efficiency is the primary trade-off, with the skinny chassis and Core Extremely 7 366H yielding the bottom multi-core scores among the many 4 programs in Cinebench and 7-Zip. Its built-in Intel Graphics additionally fell properly behind the Radeon 890M programs in most SPECviewperf CAD exams. The Professional 5 14 Intel makes the comparability even more durable, because it prices $108 much less as configured whereas providing the higher-tier Core Extremely X7 368H and Arc B390 graphics, giving it a big benefit in most GPU and native AI workloads. The Professional 5 16 AMD can be $952 much less and is the stronger possibility for lengthy CPU-heavy workloads, although it’s bigger, heavier, and lasts significantly much less time on battery.

That leaves the Professional 7 14 Intel greatest suited to fleets that rank mobility, endurance, and manageability forward of efficiency per greenback. Consumers who flip these priorities have higher solutions one shelf over: the Professional 5 14 Intel for GPU and AI work at $108 much less, or the Professional 5 16 AMD for sustained CPU throughput at $952 much less. For the manager who lives out of a bag and an IT staff that has to handle that laptop computer from three time zones away, that is the one to select.
