Hybrid-driver in-ear screens have develop into a dominant pressure within the audiophile world, mixing a number of transducer varieties to realize wide-ranging, detailed sound signatures. Among the many prime contenders within the high-end class are the Flipears Zurq XXIV and the Campfire Audio Bonneville . Each fashions function wealthy driver arrays, price above the $1,000 mark, and promise an immersive, premium listening expertise. On this comparability, we’ll break down what units every IEM aside—from design and match to sound signature—so you’ll be able to resolve which fits your ears and musical tastes greatest.
What’s In The Field
FlipEars Zurq XXIV – $1,099
- Zurq XXIV IEMs
- Removable 2-pin cable with 4.4mm termination
- Assorted eartips
- Silver chrome zippered carrying case
- Customized Zurq faceplate
Campfire Bonneville – $1,399
- Bonneville IEMs
- Time Stream Cable (3.5mm or 4.4mm selectable)
- Marshmallow & Silicone Earphone Ideas
- Light-weight protecting “Breezy Bag”
- Cleansing instrument
- Campfire Audio lapel pin
Each fashions supply a considerate unboxing expertise, full with equipment that help consolation and compatibility. Campfire features a few extra creature comforts, whereas FlipEars focuses on sturdiness and customization.
Design & Performance
Aesthetically and ergonomically, these two IEMs supply distinct design philosophies. The Zurq XXIV sports activities a daring visible identification with glittery orange shells and a semi-transparent gray physique, providing a peek on the inside tribrid driver array. Nonetheless, the housing is comparatively cumbersome, and the big nozzle diameter could also be a problem for smaller ears or those that depend on third-party eartips. The Bonneville, against this, encompasses a glossy, ergonomically contoured shell designed for a common match that mimics the texture of customized molds. Although it additionally leans on the bigger aspect, its extra refined form and standard-sized nozzle give customers extra flexibility in reaching a safe, snug match. Each IEMs are constructed with consideration to element and sturdiness, however Campfire edges forward in long-term consolation and ease of eartip customization, whereas Flipears presents a visually hanging design with an audiophile-focused 4.4mm cable as customary.
Technical Specs
Specification |
Zurq XXIV |
Bonneville |
| Driver Configuration | Tribrid Design: – 2 Electrostatics – 3 Balanced Armatures – 2 SoniXwoofers |
Hybrid Design: – 10mm Dynamic – 3 Balanced Armatures |
| Frequency Response | 5Hz – 70kHz | 5Hz – 20kHz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω @ 1kHz | 29 Ω @ 1kHz |
| Sensitivity | 116 dB | 94 dB |
Technically, each fashions are hybrid marvels, although they diverge in configuration and tuning philosophy. The Zurq XXIV boasts a seven-driver tribrid setup, combining two electrostatic drivers, three balanced armatures, and two SoniXwoofers (dynamic drivers) for an ultra-wide frequency vary of 5Hz–70kHz. It additionally presents a low 20Ω impedance and excessive 116dB sensitivity, making it simpler to drive from transportable sources. The Bonneville , with a extra conventional four-driver hybrid setup (10mm dynamic + 3 BAs), presents a extra grounded frequency vary of 5Hz–20kHz, 29Ω impedance, and a sensitivity of 94dB. On paper, the Zurq offers extra headroom and output effectivity, whereas the Bonneville focuses on clear, managed supply by way of a extra conservative driver association.
Listening Evaluate
Soundstage and Imaging
In the case of soundstage, each IEMs ship immersive, three-dimensional experiences—however in very alternative ways. The Zurq XXIV paints a large, expansive stereo picture with sturdy lateral separation and depth, making a cinematic sense of house. Its layering feels mild and ethereal, particularly with large-scale preparations, although it barely lacks in vertical dimension. The Bonneville , in the meantime, presents a barely extra compact however tighter stage with higher spatial management. Devices are exactly positioned, and its stage expands outward with a pure sense of immersion, aided by glorious isolation. Whereas the Zurq emphasizes measurement and ambiance, the Bonneville prioritizes accuracy and coherence—making each equally participating relying in your listening fashion.
Bass Response
Bass efficiency on these IEMs showcases their distinctive tuning identities. The Zurq XXIV leans right into a weighty, dynamic low finish that gives a thick, impactful basis with out muddying the combination. Its bass is tuned with heat and extension, providing satisfying subbass rumble and midbass punch. Then again, the Bonneville delivers a extra restrained however surgically exact bass response. Its 10mm dynamic driver is quick, clear, and balanced—producing simply sufficient subbass presence to floor a combination with out dominating it. Each IEMs transition easily from lows to mids, however the place the Zurq provides colour and drama, the Bonneville retains issues tight, clear, and tonally refined.
Midrange Efficiency
The midrange is the place essentially the most distinction between the 2 emerges. Within the Zurq XXIV , the mids are barely recessed, lending a delicate U-shaped signature. Vocals and melodic content material sit additional again within the combine however stay clear and well-layered, encouraging centered, intentional listening. This creates a way of house however can typically really feel hole relying on the observe. Conversely, the Bonneville pushes the midrange ahead, particularly vocals and lead devices, making them the emotional core of the sound signature. It presents excellent texture, layering, and presence, with out sounding overly aggressive. The place the Zurq’s midrange is extra atmospheric and analytical, the Bonneville is extra direct and emotionally participating.
Treble Element
Each IEMs exhibit glorious treble tuning, however their presentation differs in taste and texture. The Zurq XXIV makes use of electrostatic drivers to ship a crisp, ethereal prime finish with refined extension. Its highs shimmer with out harshness, balancing readability and luxury to keep away from fatigue even throughout lengthy periods. In the meantime, the Bonneville delivers a equally vivid and articulate treble, although with barely extra pure decay and tonal cohesion. Cymbals, strings, and excessive vocal harmonics are rendered with delicacy and ease, contributing to an easy sense of readability. Whereas the Zurq’s treble feels ethereal and open, the Bonneville brings a barely extra grounded and built-in really feel—each equally compelling however in another way tuned.
Last Ideas
The Flipears Zurq XXIV and Campfire Audio Bonneville each earn their place within the premium IEM class with distinctive sound signatures, high-end builds, and considerate equipment. The Zurq presents a grander scale with expansive staging and impactful low-end power, making it a superb selection for listeners who take pleasure in cinematic, bass-forward shows with refined top-end sparkle. The Bonneville, alternatively, delivers an intimate, emotionally participating sound with ahead mids and crisp, pure treble—good for vocal and acoustic-focused genres.
Neither IEM feels superior in all classes; as an alternative, they mirror two distinct philosophies in high-end tuning. For many who crave spacious soundscapes and energetic dynamics , the Zurq XXIV shines. For listeners searching for refined readability and a mid-centric, detailed profile , the Bonneville often is the good match.
You will get each the Flipears Zurq XXIV and the Campfire Bonneville at Audio46.
Full Evaluations of Featured Merchandise
FlipEars Zurq XXIV Evaluate: Tribrid Greatness
Campfire Audio Bonneville Evaluate
