Not too long ago, I acquired into hassle in a web based feedback part by claiming that individuals “ought to” purchase the iPhone 17 as a substitute of an Air, as a result of the Air is an inherently worse product. As anticipated, some folks rushed to the Air’s protection, arguing that thinness and lightness will be price as a lot as any characteristic. From there, issues rapidly took a flip. A number of folks insisted that I had no proper to say what different folks ought to worth; one particular person even argued I used to be “dictating” what folks can buy, as if I have been placing a gun to somebody’s head on the Apple Retailer.<\/p>\n
To make my place clearer, I’ll say upfront that I am impressed by the Air as a bit of engineering. Regardless of it being so skinny, it is remarkably robust, to the purpose that testers have wanted industrial gear to get it to bend or break. And as Apple was desirous to level out throughout its announcement, many of the “guts” of the telephone — comparable to its processor and storage — are all stuffed into the digital camera bump (AKA plateau). Many of the body is devoted to its lithium-ion battery, and that is no imply feat.<\/p>\n
Let’s get this straight although: excessive thinness and lightness should not that significant in 2025. Whereas the Air could be nice to carry, I am unable to bear in mind the final time I heard anybody, wherever significantly complain in regards to the measurement or weight of a smartphone that wasn’t deliberately outsized, just like the iPhone 17 Professional Max or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Extremely. That is as a result of smartphones have been each skinny and light-weight for a really very long time. Even the heaviest iPhones ever, the 13 Professional Max and 14 Professional Max, weighed simply 8.47 ounces (240 grams) every. The Air could also be noticeably lighter at 5.82 ounces (165 grams), however nobody is struggling to carry up a Professional Max except they have higher issues at work.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
If the Air in some way proves fashionable in the long term, it may ship the mistaken message to Apple — you could cost folks extra for much less and get away with it.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n
Greater fashions could also be more durable to stuff right into a pocket, however that is owing to display screen measurement greater than thickness — which the Air does not remedy. The product has a 6.5-inch show, larger than the 6.3-inch one on the iPhone 17. Apple does not even depend the Air’s digital camera bump when it measures thickness, both. At that a part of the system, it is about 11.32mm — just under the 11.4mm of the iPhone 17’s bump. If you cannot get a 17 in your pocket, chances are high the Air shall be simply as unhealthy, if not worse.<\/p>\n
All this could be irrelevant if it weren’t for the Air’s digital camera tech, battery life, and pricing. In contrast to the 17, there is no secondary ultra-wide digital camera. You’ll be able to’t shoot macro images, not to mention tight group portraits or large vistas. Battery life, in the meantime, is sufficient, however nonetheless decrease than that of each different iPhone within the fall 2025 catalog. So actually, you are paying $200 greater than a 17 for one thing that shall be more durable to reside with. You do get a sooner A19 Professional processor, however even that has one much less GPU core than the identical chip within the iPhone 17 Professional.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
Sure, then, the iPhone Air is a foul deal. And if it in some way proves fashionable in the long term, it may ship the mistaken message to Apple — you could cost folks extra for much less and get away with it.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"iphone-air-1\"](\"https:\/\/static0.pocketlintimages.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/iphone-air-1.jpg?q=70&fit=contain&w=420&dpr=1\")
\n <\/picture>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n